Saturday, February 9, 2013

Leaving the Country for Two Weeks

Hi everyone!

I just wanted to let you know that I'm going to be out of the country for two weeks (Israel and Spain), so I won't be online much. I will try to catch up on all of my blog reading when I get back.

Also, here's a list of books that I'm going to review sometime in late February/early March.

The Road by Cormac McCarthy (audiobook)
The Monstrumologist by Rick Yancey
Incarnate by Jodi Meadows

I also wanted to take a minute to thank everyone who's been reading/commenting/re-tweeting my posts. I don't usually like to get into "pity me, I'm an unknown blogger" territory, but the thing about online vs in-person interaction is that it's much harder to gauge feedback. (Do lack of comments mean that no one liked it or that no one saw it? Or that people did see and like it, but had nothing to say?) I'm one of those people who doesn't respond to posts/comments unless I have something to say, which is why I'm not very good at replying to each individual comment. But I do want to let you know that I do read the comments and that I appreciate each and every one of them.

Thursday, February 7, 2013

How to Apologize

This post is a result of two things.
a) all the plagiarism that's going on online
b) reading through old reviews that involved unfortunate implications on the part of the author

There are many different ways people apologize--explanations, excuses, promises not to do it again. Whatever your method of choice is, there's just one thing you have to remember:

An apology is not about you. It is about the person you wronged.

The purpose of an apology is not to defend yourself or to win back the favor of your readers or the person who's mad at you. If that is your primary goal, then you are not really apologizing.

The purpose of an apology is to acknowledge that you did something wrong and that your actions hurt someone. Think about it from the other person's perspective. It's bad enough when someone hurts you, but it's even worse if that person fails to acknowledge that you were wronged in any way. If you, the offender, are disregarding that person's feelings, then you are not really apologizing.

I also want to add that part of your responsibility to the person you wronged is to make sure that person doesn't get harassed because of your actions. You may think your fans are kind, intelligent people, but loyalty can make them do stupid or even cruel things. Beautifully Invisible, the blog that was plagiarized by The Story Siren last year, discusses how she was harassed by some of The Story Siren's defenders. Had TSS devoted one sentence of her "apology" post to asking her readers not to harass the other bloggers involved, that mess could have been prevented.

But how does this relate to book reviews?

I'm sure we've all seen cases where authors fail to apologize for offensive content or glaring errors in their novels. Remember when P.C. Cast failed to acknowledge a reader's anger over the word "retard" in her book, and then used her next book to defend herself? Or the way E.L. James refuses to admit that her books feature an abusive relationship? Or, my favorite, when Christopher Pike used a sock puppet to defend his very obvious research!fail? (yes, I know I've linked to that before, but it never. stops. being. hilarious.) In all of those cases, it would have been very easy for each of these authors to write a blog post saying "Yes, I made these mistakes. I'm sorry. Next time I'll be more thoughtful and less of an ignorant/lazy fuck." Why is it so rare for authors to be able to do that?

And then you get authors who don't even address the mistakes. When I reviewed Origin and Beta last year, I pointed out issues that bothered me, not just in a "this is bad writing" way, but in an "unfortunate implications" kind of way. In Origin, the issue was the author's horrendous misrepresentation of cerebral palsy. In Beta, I was upset by how the protagonist wasn't allowed to get an abortion after she'd been raped. I figured these books must have been out long enough that these authors would have heard people complaining about these issues, and I wondered if they had thought to apologize for them. I didn't find anything. (But admittedly, I didn't look that hard. If you happen to find something where either of them addresses the issue, please link me to it.) And while silence is certainly better than starting an accusation war, it's still failing to address the issue: that somebody was hurt by your writing.

I'm not much of a fan of Veronica Roth's books, but one thing I admire about her as a person is that she's not afraid to admit when she made a mistake. I was especially impressed by the way she apologized for how her personal biases led to her writing Tobias as white, even though he should have been a POC. A lot of whitewashing in books/movies gets brushed off as NBD, and people refuse to acknowledge that the under-representation of minorities might actually have detrimental psychological and sociological effects. It takes a lot of courage, humility, and maturity for an author to actually admit that she made a mistake. Same goes for Justine Larbaliester's great post on racism and Liar.

People wouldn't complain to you if they didn't legitimately feel hurt or offended by your actions or writing. So please, when someone calls you out on a mistake, please examine your actions and think about them before you get defensive. Maybe you can actually learn something.

Sunday, February 3, 2013

Book Recommendation: The Crown of Embers

Remember when I wrote that post about Sequel Anxiety and how I was nervous about this sequel because I wasn't sure The Girl of Fire and Thorns needed a sequel, and I didn't know if this book would be as good as the first?

I'm glad to say I was proven wrong--because The Crown of Embers is much better than its predecessor.

The Girl of Fire and Thorns is about a girl learning to believe in herself and find her own inner strength. The Crown of Embers is about learning how to use that strength for the greater good--not just how to use it effectively, but more importantly, how to use it wisely (and where to draw the line.) Over the course of the book, Elisa has to deal with a struggling kingdom and the inner and outer forces that threaten it--problems that cannot always be resolved with a magical amulet. She has to make a lot of unpleasant decisions, some of which conflict with her own moral beliefs.

One thing I appreciate about this series is that Elisa is never a passive character. Not only is she always making decisions, but her decisions are actually believable--they're never too idealistic, nor are they cruelly self-serving. More importantly, her decisions have consequences, and they're not always good ones. And I appreciated that she continues to question her ability to rule and/or serve as the Chosen One.

I also liked how the characters in this book were much better developed than in the first book, especially Hector and Mara. And the romantic development was gradual enough that I had no problems believing it.

One of the only real issues I had was the ending--it's the kind of major cliffhanger ending writers use to convince people to buy Book Three, and believe me, you have seen it before. (Not that I wasn't going to pick up The Bitter Kingdoms, because I totally would, cliffhanger or no.)

In short, if you liked The Girl of Fire and Thorns, you will definitely like The Crown of Embers.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...